YouTube video- Trandisciplinary Research
YouTube Video on the Transdisciplinary Research
Fill out either a low-risk or a high-risk form.
Low-Risk Ethics Form - If the project is one in which the nature of the potential/actual risk of harm to participants or the researcher is minimal and no more than is normally encountered in daily life, then a Low-Risk Application should be completed.
High-Risk Ethics Form - Research that does involve a certain amount of risk for the researcher and/or participants requires the completion and submission of a Full Application.
Once you and your supervisor are happy with it, send it to your Research Leader. Anthea Fester is the Research Leader for the Design Factory
Note. From "Transdisciplinary research: Principles, processes, and products" [video], by ASEE_DC, 2018, October 20. YouTube. (https://youtu.be/7NPoMXpbjCQ). Copyright 2018 by ASEE_DC.
This field guide defines transdisciplinary research as research that integrates knowledge across academic disciplines and with non-academic stakeholders to address societal challenges. It is guided by the principle that ‘scientific rigor meets societal relevance’.
YouTube Video on Problem framing in transdisciplinary research
Resources/ Books
Journal Articles
Bella Chiesa, B., Christoph, V., & Hinton, C. (2009). How many brains does it take to build a new light: Knowledge management challenges of a transdisciplinary project? Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.01049.x |
Klein, J. T. (2013). The transdisciplinary moment(um). Integral Review, 9(2), 189 – 199. http://www.integral-review.org/issues/vol_9_no_2_jun_2013_full_issue.pdf#page=194 |
Mitchell, C., Cordell, D., & Fam, D. (2015). Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research. Futures, 65, 86-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.007 |
Montuori, A. (2005). Gregory Bateson and the Promise of Transdisciplinarity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 12(1-2). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/af57/4ea4faa818c61c8db8a1fe7a4ed61987845c.pdf |
Montuori, A. (2013). The complexity of Transdisciplinary literature reviews. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 10(1/2), 45–55. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/complicity/index.php/complicity/article/view/20399/15670 |
Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinary: Levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(1), 19-38. http://basarab-nicolescu.fr/Docs_Notice/TJESNo_1_12_2010.pdf |
Nicolescu, B. (2014). Methodology of transdisciplinarity. World Futures, 70(3-4), 186-199. file:///C:/Users/lbdxc/Downloads/ArticleWorldfutures.pdf |
Polk, M. (2015). Transdisciplinary co-production: Designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures, 65, 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001 Library Link |
Roux, D. J., Stirzaker, R. J., Breen, C. M., Lefroy, E., & Cresswell, H. P. (2010). Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(8), 733-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.002 Library Link |
Shenton, A. K., & Hay-Gibson, N. V. (2011). Information behaviour and information literacy: The ultimate in transdisciplinary phenomena? Journal of Librarianship and information Science, 43(1), 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611410767 Library Link |
Scholz, R. W., & Steiner, G. (2015). The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science, 10(4), pp. 527-544. 10.1007/s11625-015-0326-4 Library Link |
Stokols, D. (2006). Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. American journal of community psychology, 38(1-2), pp. 63-77. DOI 10.1007/s10464-006-9060-5 Library Link |
Wickson, F., Carew, A. L., & Russell, A. W. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures, 38(9), pp. 1046-1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011 Library Link |
Other Resources
Roodt, H. (2018). A mode of thought: A brief introduction to transdisciplinarity and the ethical guiding principles for practice in the Masters of Applied Innovation.
Dobson, A. P. (2014). Yellowstone wolves and the forces that structure natural systems. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002025
Kinnunen, J. (2018). Role of boundary objects in knowledge co-creation: A case study of a service co-design workshop (Information Networks Master of Science). Aalto University, Helsinki. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/32485/master_Kinnunen_Joel_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Levinson, M. (2016, January 21). Transdisciplinarity: Thinking inside and outside the box [Blog post]. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/transdiciplinarity-thinking-inside-outside-box-matt-levinson
Martin, V. (2017). Transdisciplinarity revealed. https://www.abc-clio.com/ABC-CLIOCorporate/product.aspx?pc=A5037P
Levinson, M. (2016, January 21). Transdisciplinarity: Thinking inside and outside the box [Blog post]. https://www.edutopia.org/blog/transdiciplinarity-thinking-inside-outside-box-matt-levinson
Martin, V. (2017). Transdisciplinarity Revealed. https://www.abc-clio.com/ABC-CLIOCorporate/product.aspx?pc=A5037P
"Engaging stakeholders is often critical for addressing problems because we can’t understand or solve societal challenges without their knowledge and action. It is also more likely that research ideas are adopted by stakeholders when we engage with them directly and build trust over time. There is a long history of participatory practice and extensive academic literature that lends rigor to this approach".
TDR has three axioms of research. They are ontological, logical, and complex axioms (Nicolescu, 2010). These three axioms are the controlling ideas that shape the TDR framework and help describe the ideologies of the methodology.
YouTube Video: Wolves save yellowstone park
YouTube Video: What is System Thinking?
YouTube video: The Explainer: Design Thinking