Systematic reviews
Systematic reviews are a comprehensive scientific study of ALL evidence about a topic.
They follow a structured process. They have to, because if the methodology is not sound, the conclusions won't be sound.
How do systematic reviews differ from literature reviews?
They do not have a selection process of study material based on a hypothesis like literature reviews. They select ALL material that is relevant to the topic. They are therefore unbiased.
This video is an introduction to the steps involved in doing a systematic review and is a good place to start if you aren't sure what's required:
Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health. (2018). The steps of a systematic review [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FQSsnaAtOU
What needs to be included in the reviews?
This video from Yale University Library explains Systematic Reviews in a bit more depth:
Yale University Library. (n.d.). Systematic searches #1: Introduction [Video]. Yale University. https://library.medicine.yale.edu/tutorials/948
Grey literature
Grey literature is literature that has been published informally and is non-commercial. It isn't peer reviewed, but can still be a valid form of literature. Grey literature can be in the form of:
For an exhaustive list of types of grey literature, visit GreyNet.
Systematic review standards
The best way to approach your systematic review is to use a standard.
Standards provide the systematic framework for collecting and analysing all the sources on your topic.
Commonly used standards include:
PRISMA - for systematic reviews of qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method studies that evaluate the effects of health interventions. This standard tends to be used at Wintec for Sports Science and Physiotherapy systematic reviews.
PICO - for quantitative clinical studies. This standard tends to be used at Wintec for post-graduate Nursing systematic reviews.
PICo - for qualitative clinical studies. This standard tends to be also used at Wintec for post-graduate Nursing systematic reviews.