Skip to Main Content

Research Skills

Information to help students find, evaluate, reference, and write for their assignments

Systematic reviews

Systematic reviews are a comprehensive scientific study of ALL evidence about a topic.

They follow a structured process. They have to, because if the methodology is not sound, the conclusions won't be sound.


Quick links


How do systematic reviews differ from literature reviews?

They do not have a selection process of study material based on a hypothesis like literature reviews. They select ALL material that is relevant to the topic. They are therefore unbiased.

This video is an introduction to the steps involved in doing a systematic review and is a good place to start if you aren't sure what's required:

Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health. (2018). The steps of a systematic review [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FQSsnaAtOU 


What needs to be included in the reviews?

  • sources from all geographical regions
  • grey literature as well as published literature (see below for a definition of grey literature)
  • sources that have a sound methodology. If they don't, they are not a valid study and cannot be used

This video from Yale University Library explains Systematic Reviews in a bit more depth:

Yale University Library. (n.d.). Systematic searches #1: Introduction [Video]. Yale University. https://library.medicine.yale.edu/tutorials/948

Grey literature

Grey literature is literature that has been published informally and is non-commercial. It isn't peer reviewed, but can still be a valid form of literature. Grey literature can be in the form of:

  • government documents
  • conference papers
  • statistics
  • infographics
  • dissertations and theses
  • clinical trials

For an exhaustive list of types of grey literature, visit GreyNet.


Systematic review standards

The best way to approach your systematic review is to use a standard.

Standards provide the systematic framework for collecting and analysing all the sources on your topic.

Commonly used standards include:

PRISMA - for systematic reviews of qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method studies that evaluate the effects of health interventions. This standard tends to be used at Wintec for Sports Science and Physiotherapy systematic reviews.

PICO - for quantitative clinical studies. This standard tends to be used at Wintec for post-graduate Nursing systematic reviews.

PICo - for qualitative clinical studies. This standard tends to be also used at Wintec for post-graduate Nursing systematic reviews.

Contact Us
library@wintec.ac.nz

City Campus
(07) 834 8866
Rotokauri
(07) 834 8800 ext 4452